• Blog
  • Sanskrit
  • About
  • ayodhyā


    Monier-Williams Sanskrit-English Dictionary (2nd ed.)

    ☞ p. 86, col. 1.
    a-yodhyā (ā), f. the capital of Rāma (the modern Oude on the river Sarayu described in R. i, 5).

    Bopp Glossarium Sanscritum

    ☞ p. 17, col. 2.
    ayodhyā f. (non impugnanda, ex a priv. et yodhya im-

    pugnandus in fem.) nomen urbis (Oude).

    Śabdakalpadruma

    ☞ vol. 1, p. 92.
    ayodhyā , strī, (yoddhumaśakyā, yudha + ṇyut, nañ-
    samāsaḥ .) śrīrāmanagarī . paścimadeśe aod
    iti prasiddhā . tatparyyāyaḥ . sāketaṃ 2 kośalā
    3 . iti hemacandraḥ .. uttarakośalā 4 . iti
    trikāṇḍaśeṣaḥ .. sā tu mokṣadā purī . yathā, —
    “ayodhyā mathurā māyā kāśī kāñcī avantikā .
    purī dvāravatī caiva saptaitā mokṣadāyikāḥ ..
    etāstu pṛthivīmadhye na gaṇyante kadācana .
    śrīrāmadhanuragrasthā ayodhyā sā mahāpurī” ..
    iti bhūtaśuddhitantraṃ .. * .. tadvarṇanaṃ yathā, —
    “kośalo nāma muditaḥ sphīto janapado mahān .
    niviṣṭaḥ sarayūtīre prabhūtadhanadhānyavān ..
    ayodhyā nāma nagarī tatrāsīllokaviśrutā .
    manunā mānavendreṇa yā purī nirmmitā svayam ..
    āyatā daśa ca dve ca yojanāni mahāpurī .
    śrīmatī trīṇi vistīrṇā suvibhaktamahāpathā ..
    rājamārgeṇa mahatā suvibhaktena śobhitā .
    muktapuṣpāvakīrṇena jalasiktena nityaśaḥ ..
    tāntu rājā daśaratho mahārāṣṭravivarddhanaḥ .
    purīmāvāsayāmāsa divi devapatiryathā ..
    kapāṭatoraṇavatīṃ suvibhaktāntarāpaṇāṃ .
    sarvvayantrāyudhavatīmuṣitāṃ sarvvaśilpibhiḥ ..
    sūtamāgadhasambādhāṃ śrīmatīmatulaprabhāṃ .
    uccāṭṭāladhvajavatīṃ śataghnīśatasaṃkulāṃ ..
    badhūnāṭakasaṃghaiśca saṃyuktāṃ sarvvataḥ purīṃ .
    udyānāmravaṇopetāṃ mahatīṃ śālamekhalāṃ ..
    durgagambhīraparikhāṃ durgāmanyairdurāsadāṃ .
    vājivāraṇasampūrṇāṃ gobhiruṣṭraiḥ kharaistathā ..
    sāmantarājasaṅgheśca balikarmmabhirāvṛtāṃ .
    nānādeśanivāsaiśca baṇigbhirupaśobhitāṃ ..
    prāsādaiḥ ratnavikṛtaiḥ parbbatairiva śobhitāṃ .
    kūṭāgāraiśca samparṇāmindrasyevāmarāvatīṃ ..
    citrāmaṣṭāpadākārāṃ varanārīgaṇairyutāṃ .
    sarvvaratnasamākīrṇāṃ vimānagṛhaśobhitāṃ ..
    gṛhagāḍhāmavicchidrāṃ samabhūmau niveśitāṃ .
    śālitaṇḍulasampūrṇāmikṣukāṇḍarasodakāṃ ..
    dundubhībhirmṛdaṅgaiśca vīṇābhiḥ paṇavaistathā .
    nāditāṃ bhṛśamatyarthaṃ pṛthivyāṃ tāmanuttamāṃ ..
    vimānamiva siddhānāṃ tapasādhigataṃ divi .
    suniveśitaveśmāntāṃ narottamasamāvṛtāṃ ..
    ye ca bāṇairna bidhyanti viviktamaparāparaṃ .
    śabdabedhyañca vitataṃ laghuhastā viśāradāḥ ..
    siṃhavyāghravarāhāṇāṃ mattānāṃ nadatāṃ vane .
    hantāro niśitaiḥ śastrairbalādbāhubalairapi ..
    tādṛśānāṃ sahasraistāmabhipūrṇāṃ mahārathaiḥ .
    purīmāvāsayāmāsa rājā daśarathastadā ..
    tāmagnimadbhirguṇavadbhirāvṛtāṃ
    dvijottamairvvedaṣaḍaṅgapāragaiḥ .
    sahasradaiḥ satyaratairmahātmabhi-
    rmaharṣikalpairṛṣibhiśca kevalaiḥ” ..
    ityārṣe rāmāyaṇe bālmīkīye bālakāṇḍe pañcamaḥ
    sargaḥ .. * ..
    “tasyāṃ puryyāmayodhyāyāṃ vedavit sarvvasaṃgrahaḥ .
    dīrghadarśī mahātejāḥ paurajānapadapriyaḥ ..
    ikṣvākūṇāmatiratho yajvā dharmmaparo vaśī .
    maharṣikalpo rājarṣistriṣu lokeṣu viśrutaḥ ..
    balavānnihatāmitro bhitravān vijitendriyaḥ .
    dhanaiśca sañcayaiścānyaiḥ śakravaiśravaṇopamaḥ ..
    yathā manurmahātejā lokasya parirakṣitā .
    tathā daśaratho rājā lokasya parirakṣitā ..
    tena satyābhisandhena trivargamanutiṣṭhatā .
    pālitā sā purī śreṣṭhā indreṇevāmarāvatī ..
    tasmin puravare hṛṣṭā dharmmātmāno bahuśrutāḥ .
    narāstuṣṭā dhanaiḥ svaiḥ svairalubdhāḥ satyavādinaḥ ..
    nālpasannicayaḥ kaścittadā tasmin purottame .
    kuṭumbī yo hyasiddhārtho'gavāśvadhanadhānyavān ..
    kāmī vā na kadaryyo vā nṛśaṃsaḥ puruṣaḥ kvacit .
    draṣṭaṃ śakyamayodhyāyāṃ nāvidvānna ca nāstikaḥ ..
    sarvve narāśca nāryyaśca dharmmaśīlāḥ susaṃyatāḥ .
    muditāḥ śīlavṛttābhyāṃ maharṣaya ivāmalāḥ ..
    nākuṇḍalī nāmukuṭī nāsragvī nālpabhogavān .
    nāmṛṣṭo na na liptāṅgo nāsugandhaśca vidyate ..
    nāmṛṣṭabhojī nādātā nāpyanaṅgadaniṣkadhṛk .
    nāhastābharaṇo vāpi dṛśyate nāpyanātmavān ..
    nānāhitāgnirnāyajvā na kṣudro vā na taskaraḥ .
    kaścidāsīdayodhyāyāṃ na cāvṛtto na saṅkaraḥ ..
    svakarmmaniratā nityaṃ brāhmaṇā vijitendriyāḥ .
    dānādhyayanaśīlāśca saṃyatāśca pratigrahe ..
    nāstiko nānṛto vāpi na kaścidabahuśrutaḥ .
    nāsūyako na cāśakto nāvidvān vidyate kvacit ..
    nāṣaḍaṅgavidatrāsti nāvrato nāsahasnadaḥ .
    na dīnaḥ kṣiptacitto vā vyathito vāpi kaścana ..
    kaścinnaro vā nārī vā nāśrīmānnāpyarūpavān .
    draṣṭuṃ śakyamayodhyāyāṃ nāpi rājanyabhaktimān ..
    varṇeṣvagryacaturtheṣu devatātithipūjakāḥ .
    kṛtajñāśca vadānyāśca śūrā vikramasaṃyutāḥ ..
    dīrghāyuṣo narāḥ sarvve dharmmaṃ satyañca saṃśritāḥ .
    sahitāḥ puttrapauttraiśca nityaṃ strībhiḥ purottame ..
    kṣattraṃ brahmamukhaṃ cāsīdvaiśyāḥ kṣattramanuvratāḥ .
    śūdrāḥ svakarmmaniratāstrīn varṇānupacāriṇaḥ ..
    sā tenekṣvākunāthena purī suparirakṣitā .
    yathā purastānmanunā mānavendreṇa dhīmatā ..
    yodhānāmagnikalpānāṃ peṣalānāmamarṣiṇāṃ .
    sampūrṇā kṛtavidyānāṃ guhā keśariṇāmiva ..
    kāmbojaviṣaye jātairvvāhlīkaiśca hayottamaiḥ .
    vanāyujairnadījaiśca pūrṇā harihayottamaiḥ ..
    vindhyaparbbatajairmattaiḥ pūrṇā haimavatairapi .
    madānvitairatibalairmātaṅgaiḥ parbbatopamaiḥ ..
    airāvatakulīnaiśca mahāpadmakulaistathā .
    añjanādapi niṣkrāntairvāmanādapi ca dvipaiḥ ..
    bhadrairmandrairmṛgaiścaiva bhadramandramṛgaistathā .
    bhadramandrairbhadramṛgairmṛgamandraiśca sā purī ..
    nityamattaiḥ sadā pūrṇā nāgairacalasannibhaiḥ .
    sā yojane dve ca bhūyaḥ satyanāmā prakāśate ..
    tāṃ purīṃ sa mahātejā rājā daśaratho mahān .
    śaśāsa śamitāmitro nakṣatrāṇīva candramāḥ ..
    tāṃ satyanāmāṃ dṛḍhatoraṇārgalāṃ
    gṛhairvvicitrairupaśobhitāṃ śivāṃ .
    purīmayodhyāṃ nṛsahasrasaṃkulāṃ
    śaśāsa vai śakrasamo mahīpatiḥ” ..
    ityārṣe rāmāyaṇe vālmīkīye bālakāṇḍe ṣaṣṭhaḥ
    sargaḥ .. yuddhāyogye tri ..

    Index to the Names in the Mahābhārata

    ☞ p. 102, col. 2.
    Ayodhyā (a city, i.e. Oude, v. VP.). § 225 (Vāsiṣṭha):

    I, 177, 6780 (khyātāṃ purīm imāṃ lokeṣv A°āṃ), 6783

    (A°vāsino janāḥ), 6784.—§ 280 (Bhīmasena): II, 29, 1076

    (here Bhīm. vanquished Dīrghayajña).—§ 346 (Nalop.):

    III, 60, 2295.—§ 348 (do.): III, 66, 2628 (nagarīṃ

    ramyāṃ; the city of Ṛtuparṇa).—§ 351 (do.): III, 70,

    2745, 2761, 2766 (°vāsinaṃ nṛpaṃ Ṛtuparṇaṃ); 71, 2795

    (A°ādhipatiḥ).—§ 353 (do.): III, 74, 2906.—§ 383 (Paraśu-

    Rāma): III, 99, 8657 (A°yāṃ jātaṃ Dāśarathiṃ), 8659.—

    § 425 (Hanūmad-Bhīmas.): III, 148, 11215 (the capital of

    Rāma Dāśarathi).—§ 461 (Vāmadevacarita): III, 192,

    ††13145 (king Parikṣit of the Ikṣvāku race).—§ 475

    (Dhundhumārop.): III, 202, 13515 (kings Ikṣvāku,

    Śaśāda, etc.).—§ 534 (Hanūmatpratyāgam.): III, 282,

    16231 (at the return of Hanūmat, Rāma again hopes to rule

    at A.).—§ 543 (Rāmābhiṣeka): III, 291, 16567 (purīṃ

    ramyāṃ), 16568, 16590.—§ 565 (Gālavacarita): V, 115,

    3934 (king Haryaśva Ikṣvāku).

    The Purāṇa Index

    ☞ vol. 1, p. 95.
    Ayodhyā — the capital of Ikṣvākus. The children of

    Ayodhyā were cast into the Sarayū by Asamañ-

    jasa and then restored to life by his yogic power.1

    Chief buildings were prāsāda, gopura, sabhā, caitya and

    devagṛha;2 one of the holy cities.3 City of Rama and

    Sagara;4 also known as Śāketa.5 Capital of Madhyadeśa of

    King Divākara, famous for Rāmatīrtham;6 in the nose por-

    tion of the personified Veda.7 [Footnote] 1) Bhā. IX. 8. 17-19. [Footnote] 2) Ib. IX. 11. 25-34; Br. III. 63. 21; [Footnote] 3) Br. IV. 40. 91. [Footnote] 4) Br. III. 37. 33; 47. 75; 48. 1; 49. 10 and 58;

    53. 5. [Footnote] 5) Br. III. 54. 54. [Footnote] 6) M. 191. 93; 271. 5. Vi. IV. 4. 97;

    Vā. 99. 282. [Footnote] 7) Vā. 88. 20, 94; 104. 81: 111. 68.

    Puranic Encyclopedia

    ☞ p. 85, col. 1.
    AYODHYĀ . A city in North India which enjoyed great

    importance and reputation for many years as the capi-

    tal of the Kings of the solar dynasty. (See Ikṣvāku

    dynasty). All the Kings of this dynasty ruled the coun-

    try from this city as their capital. Vasiṣṭha, the great

    preceptor of the Ikṣvāku Rājas, came to Ayodhyā dur-

    ing the period of the reign of Kalmāṣapāda, who was

    the thirty-fifth ruler in succession to Ikṣvāku. A quarrel

    broke out between Kalmāṣapāda and Vasiṣṭha during

    a hunting expedition, and Vasiṣṭha cursed the King

    and as the result the latter became a Rākṣasa. After

    regaining his former form as King, he apologised to

    Vasiṣṭha and they became friends again. At the requ-

    est of the King in the interests of his dynasty Vasiṣṭha

    came to Ayodhyā, and the people were greatly elated.

    A son was born to Vasiṣṭha by Kalmāṣapāda's wife and

    that son was Aśmaka. After that Vasiṣṭha used to go to

    Ayodhyā frequently and was installed as family precep-

    tor of the Ikṣvākus. Till the time of Śrī Rāma the city

    of Ayodhyā maintained its pomp and glory, and after

    that gradually its decay and fall set in. Laudatory refe-

    rences to the city are found in most of the Purāṇas

    like the Mahābhārata, Brahmāṇḍa Purāṇa etc. (See

    Kosala).

    Personal and Geographical Names in the Gupta Inscriptions

    ☞ p. 236.
    (2) Ayodhyā (No. 21, L. 1; No. 37, L. 6; No. 39, L. 10):

    In No. 21 the word ‘Ayodhyā-Vāsaka’ occurs355 while in No. 37

    and 39 the word ‘Āyodhyaka’ has been mentioned. In No, 21,

    Ayodhyā is described as a victorious camp. full of great ships,

    and elephants and horses. In No. 39 certain brāhmaṇas belong-

    ing to Ayodhyā, living in the vicinity of Mahādeva Śaileśvara

    are named and are mentioned as belonging to various gotras

    and caraṇas, and as proficient in observants, in sacred duty,

    in the mantras, the sūtras, bhāṣyas and pravacanas.356

    It has been venerated as one of the most important and

    holy places of the Hindus.357 Vinītā was another name for

    this city.358 Its other names including Viṇīā (Vinītā) are men-

    tioned in the Vividhatīrthakalpa.359 Fa-Hsien calls it Sha-che

    and Ptolemy knew it as Sogeda.360 Ayodhyā and Sāketa have

    been treated by many writers as being identical. Csoma de

    kōrös361 calls this place as “Sāketan or Ayodhyā” and H.H.

    Wilson in his dictionary, refers to Sāketa as ‘the city of

    Ayodhyā’. Several passages in the Raghuvaṃśa362 confirm it.

    The Vividhatīrthakalpa mentions Sākeyam (Sāketa) as a

    synonym for Ayodhyā,363 but in the Buddhist literature we find

    separate references to Ayodhyā and Sāketa which creates

    doubt about their identity and suggests that the two existed

    separately.364 V. Pathak quotes a well known verse occurring

    in the Yuga Purāṇa, a section of Gārgī Saṃhitā,365 to show

    that Sāketa is the same as Ayodhyā. But there is nothing in

    the passage to support the view.

    The ancient city of Ayodhyā or Sāketa is described in the

    Rāmāyaṇa as situated on the banks of the Sarayū or Sarjū

    river.366 During the Buddhist period, Ayodhyā was divided into

    Uttara (Northern) Kosala and Dakṣiṇa (Southern) Kosala.

    The river Sarayū was the dividing line between the two pro-

    vinces. Ayodhyā was the capital of the latter.367 Ancient

    tradition believes it to have been built by Manu.368

    The history of Kośala, with its mighty King Prasenajit and

    his son Vidudabha pales into insignificance with the emergence

    of the Magadhan rulers as powerful antagonists. The Nandas,

    followed by the Mauryas, assimilated Kośala in their empire.

    Under the Śuṅgas, it was being ruled by a viceroy. An inscrip-

    tion from Ayodhyā mentions Puṣyamitra as having performed

    two horse-sacrifices. Under the Kuṣāṇas, the city remained

    more or less in oblivion. Subsequently in the Purāṇas it figures

    along with Prayāga and Magadha as forming part of

    the kingdom of the Guptas. The spurious Gayā Plate of

    Samudragupta (No. 21) mentions it as a seat of a Gupta

    camp of victory. The history of the city in the post-

    Gupta period is wrapped up in obscurity. It was within the

    empire of the Pratihāras and Gāhaḍavālas of Kanauj. Ayodhyā

    is described by Muslim historians369 to have been a wilder-

    ness.

    The Slaves and Khilji rulers held sway over it, and subse-

    quently it received importance as the headquarters of Oudh.

    It was under the charge of Muslim governors appointed from

    Delhi, but with the emergence of Jaunpur as a strong kingdom

    Ayodhyā was completely over-shadowed. It was a mint-town

    in the time of Akbar, but there is no reference to it in later

    Chronicles.370

    Ayodhyā is important as a centre of pilgrimage. There are

    several places in the city connected with different events in the

    life of Rāma. Rāma was born at a place called Janmasthāna. At

    Chīrodaka also called Chīrasāgara, Daśaratha performed, with

    the help of Ṛṣyaśṛṅga Ṛṣi, the sacrifices for obtaining a son.

    At a place called Tretā-kā-Ṭhākur, Rāmacandra performed the

    horse sacrifice by setting up the image of Sītā. At Ratnamaṇ-

    ḍapa, he held his Council,371 at Swargadwāram in Fyzabad,

    his body was burnt. At Lakṣmaṇa-kuṇḍa, Lakṣmaṇa disappeared

    in the river Sarayū. Daśaratha accidentally killed Śravaṇa,

    the blind Ṛṣi's son, at Majhaurā in the district of Fyzabad.372

    Ayodhyā engaged the attention of the Muslim rulers some of

    whom set up mosques here, of these the mosques of Babar and

    and Aurangzeb are notable.373 At present this city forms a

    part of the district of Fyzabad.

    Mahābhārata Cultural Index

    ☞ p. 509, col. 1.
    Ayodhyā f.: Name of a city, also called

    Kosalā (3. 75. 3; 3. 263. 29).

    A. Location: In the east (yayau

    prācīṃ diśaṃ prati) 2. 26. 1. B. Des-

    cription: Pleasing (ramyā) 3. 63. 19; 3.

    275. 36; excellent, best town (puravara) 1.

    168. 14; (puram uttamam) 1. 168. 19;

    famous (khyāta) 1. 168. 14; city of the

    righteous (nagarīṃ puṇyakarmaṇām) 1.

    168. 16; full of people who were contend-

    ed and well fed (tuṣṭapuṣṭajanākīrṇā) 1.

    168. 20. C. Epic event: Bhīma defeated

    king Dīrghaprajña of Ayodhyā in his ex-

    pedition to the east before the Rājasūya

    2. 27. 2. D. Past events: (1) Events

    related to Rāmāyaṇa: (i) When Lakṣmaṇa

    was held and dragged towards his mouth

    by Kabandha, he lost hope of meeting Rāma

    again when he, with Sītā, would return

    to Kosalā (nāhaṃ tvām … kosalāgataṃ/

    drakṣyāmi) 3. 263. 29; (ii) Rāma won-

    dered whether he would rule over Ayodhyā

    again after killing the enemies in battle and

    after getting Sītā back 3. 266. 34; (iii)

    After the satyakriyā of Sītā, Rāma told

    Daśaratha that he would return to Ayodhyā

    at his bidding; Daśaratha asked him to go

    to Ayodhyā and rule over it 3. 275. 36-37;

    (iv) On reaching Ayodhyā, Rāma sent Ha-

    nūmant to Bharata 3. 275. 59; (2) Events

    related to the story of Nala: (i) Vārṣṇeya,

    the charioteer of Nala, left Nala's children

    with king Bhīma of Kuṇḍinapura and

    went to Ayodhyā to seek service with king

    Ṛtuparṇa 3. 57. 22; (ii) Karkoṭaka nāga

    advised Nala to assume the name Bāhuka

    and go to king Ṛtuparṇa of Ayodhā 3. 63.

    19; Nala, accordingly, reached the town of

    Ṛtuparṇa (ṛtuparṇasya nagaram) 3. 64. 1;

    (iii) The Brāhmaṇa Parṇāda told Dama-

    yantī that he had reached Ayodhyā in

    search of Nala; Damayantī wanted Sudeva

    to be sent back to Ayodhyā to get Nala;

    Damayantī sent Sudeva to Ṛtuparṇa resid-

    ing at Ayodhyā (hence called Ayodhyāpati

    in 3. 69. 22) to announce to him that she de-

    sired another husband and for this she was

    arranging another Svayaṃvara (ṛtuparṇaṃ

    vaco brūhi patim anyaṃcikīrṣati/āsthāsyati

    punar bhaimī damayantī svayaṃvaram//)

    3. 68. 2, 16, 21; 3. 72. 17; (iv) Damayantī

    later told Nala that the Brāhmaṇa Parṇāda,

    while searching Nala, had reached the resi-

    dence of king Ṛtuparṇa in Kosalā (abhya-

    gacchat kosalāyām ṛtuparṇaniveśane) 3.

    75. 3; (3) Other events: (i) Śaśāda

    ruled over Ayodhyā after Ikṣvāku 3. 193.

    1; (ii) Parīkṣit, of Ikṣvāku family, once

    ruled over Ayodhyā 3. 190. 3; (iii) Gālava

    took Mādhavī with him and went to king

    Haryaśva of Ikṣvāku family who ruled at

    Ayodhyā 5. 113. 18; (iv) King Kalmāṣa-

    pāda, when freed from Rakṣas by Vasiṣṭha,

    returned to Ayodhyā; his subjects greeted

    him; Kalmāṣapāda entered the city with

    Vasiṣṭha; the citizens of Ayodhyā saw their

    king with Vasiṣṭha as the sun rising in

    conjunction with Puṣya; the city, with its

    streets cleansed and sprinkled with water

    and decorated with raised flags, pleased

    Kalmāṣapāda; when the king entered the

    city Ayodhyā with Vasiṣṭha, the queen, at

    the king's command, approached Vasiṣṭha

    for a son 1. 168. 14-19, 21. E. Similes:

    (1) Ayodhyā made prosperous by Kalmāṣa-

    pāda compared with the sky made to shine

    at the rise of the autumnal moon (sa hi tāṃ

    pūrayām āsa lakṣmyā … /ayodhyāṃ vyoma

    śītāṃśuḥ śaratkāla ivoditaḥ//) 1. 168. 18;

    (2) Ayodhyā, with its citizens contended

    and well nourished shone in the reign of

    Kalmāṣapāda as Amarāvatī due to Śakra

    (aśobhata tadā tena śakreṇevāmarāvatī) 1.

    168. 20.